The Ceremony of Redundancy: Vocational Dignity in Decline


A Reflection in Response to the 2025 U.S. Government Shutdown

As the United States enters its first phase of government shutdown, since 2018, President Trump has made clear his intention: this is not merely a budgetary standoff, but a strategic purge. He has stated that the shutdown will serve as a “natural weeding-out process” for roles deemed unnecessary—a sentiment echoed by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), now operating in post-Musk inertia.

But beneath the political theatre lies a deeper societal wound: the erosion of vocational dignity when need becomes ceremonial, not operational.

Continue reading “The Ceremony of Redundancy: Vocational Dignity in Decline”

Open Letter to the Prime Minister on the revision of the concept of valuations for CPOs


Dear Prime Minister Starmer,

I hope this letter finds you well. I am writing to express my concerns regarding the recent changes to compulsory purchase orders (CPOs) and the concept of “hope value” in land valuation.

While I understand the government’s intention to manage public project costs effectively, I believe that excluding hope value from CPO compensation creates inconsistencies in land valuation practices. If hope value is excluded for CPOs, it should also be excluded from the valuation of land for business rates and council taxes. This would ensure a fair and transparent system, where landowners are not disadvantaged by contradictory valuation methods. If a business’s rateable value of land is low, then owners cannot complain if that becomes the basis for compensation on a CPO, and by the same token, the state should not be giving back a lower value than the one they themselves set for the purposes of council taxes. Government should be consistent, and I am not sure that provision for this has been included in the legislation.

Furthermore, I propose that a moral payment be considered to cover the costs of rearranging investments around the affected property. This would acknowledge the broader impact on landowners beyond the immediate land value.

The term “hope value” is a neologism and not one found in any accounting standards, national or international. Moreover, it seems designed to be used exclusively by the government in their own favor against private investors. If private investors were to insist that the aspirational aspect of value be removed from market values, no deal would ever be made. As such, this is a fresh case of state exceptionalism in an area where state exceptionalism is not warranted.

Consistency in valuation practices across different governmental processes is crucial to ensure fairness and maintain public trust. I urge you to consider these points and advocate for a more balanced approach to land valuation and compensation.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Sincerely,

David of Quoracy

Is the right to vote a guarantee of democracy?


In the forthcoming UK elections, UK Citizens living abroad for more than 15 years can now register to vote. Will this make any difference to my feeling of whether or not I have a franchise in democracy?

The right to vote is only effective in producing democracy if three conditions are true:
Continue reading “Is the right to vote a guarantee of democracy?”