Quotas and Tails: When Equality Meets Extremes
In the modern pursuit of equity, governments and institutions increasingly mandate quotas for female representation in leadership roles. One common directive is that at least 40% of board-level executives must be women. While this goal reflects a commendable desire for inclusion, it raises a critical question: what happens when such quotas intersect with the statistical realities of cognitive distribution?
This essay explores the tension between equity and excellence, using IQ as a proxy for cognitive ability. It examines the implications of greater male variability in intelligence, the biological precedent for such patterns, and the potential distortion of meritocratic selection when quotas are imposed at the cognitive extreme.

You must be logged in to post a comment.