Archive
Baker Tilly Slovakia Tax Alert February 2013
| TAX ALERT | SLOVAKIA February 2013 |
![]() |
| The most significant changes to the taxation of individuals from the start of year 2013:1. Personal tax allowances for spouse– From 1st January 2013, the spouse allowance is possible to apply only if the spouse living with taxpayer in common household is: - taking care of a dependent child, or - receiving a cash allowance for nursing, or - unemployment registered and is actively seeking a job, or - considered a disabled individual or a severely disabled individual.2. Tax allowance related to voluntary contributions to II. pillar – until the 31st December 2016 taxpayers may apply as a tax allowance the amount of voluntary contributions to pension, this amount is 2% of the taxpayer´s tax bases from active income, i.e. income from employment and from business. This amount should not exceed 2% of 60-times average monthly salary reported by Statistics Office of the SR two years previously. 3. Tax bonus – the tax bonus should be apply only by taxpayer, who in the period reached 6 times the minimum wage only from active income, i.e. income from employment and from business. The tax bonus should not be applied by taxpayers who earn only rental income. 4. The lump-sum expenses from business income – changes in the implementation of lump-sum expenses in 2013: |
| Bratislava Eva Belková Managing Director Karadžičova 16 821 08 Bratislava Slovak Republic Tel: +421 250 203 302 Email: ebelkova |
Bratislava Vladimír Bartoš Head of Accounting Department Slovak Tax Advisor Karadžičova 16 821 08 Bratislava Slovak Republic Tel: +421 250 203 304 Email: vbartos |
| Disclaimer: The information contained in this material is general and does not provide a comprehensive analysis of these topics. Despite the fact that we try to ensure the timeliness and accuracy of the information contained in this material, we cannot guarantee that it will still be valid on the date it is read. Therefore users of this information should not base any business or investment decisions on it without first discussing the matter with a professional advisor. Our initial consultation is free.Privacy & Disclaimer Feedback Baker Tilly Slovakia Accounting s.r.o. and Baker Tilly Slovakia Audit s.r.o. are independent member firms of Baker Tilly International which is the world’s 8th largest accountancy and business advisory network by combined fee income of its independent members. Baker Tilly International member firms specialise in providing accountancy and business advisory services to entrepreneurial, growing businesses and mid-market corporates worldwide. |
|
||
|
|
Related articles
Tax Alert December 2012 Baker Tilly Slovakia
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||
|
|
Related articles
- VAT: an introduction. (businesshelp.lloydstsbbusiness.com)
- TurboTax – Video: Social Security Tax – Who Is Exempt? (turbotax.intuit.com)
Final Vote – Re Linked-In Discussion thread on a name to tie in West Slav Countries
Two months ago I started a discussion on the CEE Professionals Group on Linked-In.
“Help to find a phrase for PL-CZ-SK or coin one if there isn’t one…
Everyone knows what Benelux is, who the PIGS or BRIC countries are, or even what is meant if we say “German Speaking World”, but how would you find an easy way to describe the triangle of countries Poland, Czech Republic and Slovakia? Please remind me or educate me of an existing term I may have overlooked, or failing that let’s put our heads together and coin one.”
Among the 49 comments to date several very interesting options appeared, no less than 21 choices from 16 people – a testimony to the helpfulness and the creativity of the Group. So now is the time to vote on them, which I’ve asked people to do here as there’s no voting there and also people may want to vote without putting their name to the vote.
Hopefully the mods of the Group will see this as fair, as there is a chance for my regulars to know about and join the Group as well as for Group members to see this site and sub to it.
Anyway, here’s the poll and thansk in advance for your vote. I can’t see your IP Address but the machine at polldaddy does so you can only vote the once and be counted. Further attempts are not counted, but enable you to see how the vote is progessing, and when it pans out I’ll put the results into the discussion.
There isn’t a prize for the winner, other than the honour of having thought of the best one, but my heartfelt hanks for all your help in getting to an optimal answer to the problem!
Related articles
- Splitting Europe (zewar.wordpress.com)
- Sorbs: relics of the Ostsiedlung | Gene Expression (blogs.discovermagazine.com)
- Taking Your Pulse: Karaoke vote results in a tie (pbpulse.com)
Should your Company have a pro-forma audit?
For businesses which have never been audited but which are growing up quickly to meet the audit thresholds in a year or two, you may wish to consider having your first audit done while it is still voluntary to do so, and the results, if less positive than expected, can at least be kept private.
Once your business has exceeded the audit thresholds (very typically in Europe this means for a private company about 50 employees, 5 million Euros turnover and 2.5 million Euros of gross assets, and it means 2 out of those three conditions – we just stated actually the Polish ones verbatim, (with the proviso that they also state a set PLN amount to avoid subjectivity for businesses that are on the cusp), but most countries are not far off that – even the Czech Republic which really needs much smaller thresholds)
Clearly this doesn’t apply at all to public limited companies, ie. the “S.A.”, “a.s.”, UK plc or German AG style companies which must be audited regardless of size – in some jurisdictions even if they are dormant – but for private limited liability companies most jurisdictions have size criteria like the ones just given – for Slovakia about 60% of the sizes given, so please note that this is divergent from the Czech ones, which are far too high for that country and result in proportionally fewer audits, which is a bad thing for corporate governance in that country.
While you are under the limits audit is voluntary. And you can have an unofficial audit whereby the audit comes and does for you all the normal work he would do if officially appointed, but it is only pro-forma. “Pro-forma” is Latin for something like the idea of “as if” so the auditor will work and report as if they had been properly appointed, but it is really a dry run for you. You do not appoint them as statutory auditors in the minuted general meeting, you do not have to file the report as the audit was voluntary, and you get all the benefit of the audit without the risk, and on top of all of that, I can get you these pro-forma audits for only 75% of the cost of a statutory audit, because the Firms we associate with want to promote good voluntary governance practice in the economy.
If you wait for your first audit until it is an obligatory one because you’ve outgrown the size criteria – and as we come out of the recession that will happen to some of you next year hopefully sooner than you dare hope for now – then if the auditor finds something wrong then the report of the auditor could be “modified” – I’ll do a separate article on what sorts of “modifications” exist and what they mean in accountancy speak, but it’s not good if you get one.
It will not help if you need a loan, and it will probably trigger a lot of interest on the part of the tax inspector. But you’ll have to publish it anyway, if there isn’t time to do the remedial work a good auditor should outline to you in time for your statutory deadline.
Now auditors get cajoled, encouraged in a friendly way or even outright threatened by desparate managers and owners to overlook things or change to an opinion that doesn’t match the facts, and there is nothing that can be done in those circumstances. Auditors are not generally anywhere near as afraid of their client as they are of their regulator, but more than that we are educated throughout our professional lives to be independent in our outlook, and so the only way to get out of some modified opinions is to do the remedial work the auditor recommends or make the adjustments that they recommend.
There’s no point in changing to another auditor you think will be more pliable – they must write to the old auditor and ask if there are any reasons why they cannot act. The best thing to do, if you are not sure how well your company will stand up to an audit is to have your first one a year or so before you need to. Then if the audit shows up a lot to be desired, you have a whole year to put it right and nobody will ever know because auditors are bound by confidentiality – it isn’t us who even publish our reports, it’s the responsibility of the client. The report is given to its addressee, which is always the shareholder, and some other corporate governance boards if they are in existence.
So it’s well worth thinking about, especially if your business has been growing fast and maybe has outgrown its systems.
Let us know if we can help.
Related Articles
- Financial Services Authority to share audit data with Financial Reporting Council (telegraph.co.uk)
- Audit questions state park efficiency ()
- State auditor finds thousands lost to incompetence (sfgate.com)
- Regulator fears small auditors over-reaching their ability (accountancyage.com)





