Archive

Posts Tagged ‘Accounting’

Romanian Property Evaluation – December 2011

December 23, 2011 Leave a comment

Baker Tilly Klitou sent us this important reminder for those with assets in Romania

pevbtk.jpgDear Associates,

With regard to the upcoming year closing, according to the Order 3055 / 2009 for approving the Romanian Accounting Regulations, we kindly inform you that you have to perform an assessment of the tangible assets owned by the company.

Furthermore, according the art. 253 of the Law 571 / 2003 regarding Fiscal code with subsequent changes, the legal entities are required to compute and pay taxes on the buildings owned, as follows:

· between 0,5% and 1,5% of the value of the building, if the owner has performed at least an evaluation of the buildings in the last 3 fiscal years;

· between 10% and 20% of the value of the building, if the owner has not made any evaluation of the buildings in the last 3 fiscal years;

· between 20% and 40% of the value of the building, if the owner has not made any revaluation of buildings in the last 5 fiscal years.

Should you need to perform an evaluation of buildings owned by the company, so that the level of taxes payable by the company for the buildings owned to be ranked between 0,5 and 1,5 of the value of the building, please send your requests back to us to the address info

Baker Tilly Klitou is an independent member of Baker Tilly International which is a global network of high quality, independent accountancy and business services firms, all of whom are committed to providing the best possible service to you, wherever you needs help, in Romania and across the world.

Baker Tilly Klitou is member of Romanian Chartered Accountants Body (CECCAR), member of Romanian Chamber of Tax Advisors (CCFR), member of Romanian Chamber of Auditors (CAFR), as well as member of Romanian Evaluators Association (ANEVAR).

Our team includes qualified professionals able to provide full range of accounting and payroll services, tax consulting, audit as well as evaluation of properties.

Should you need further clarifications regarding the aforementioned information, our consultants are at your disposal.

BEST WISHES FOR A HEALTHY AND PROSPEROUS 2012!

Victor Papala

Senior Manager
Baker Tilly Klitou Romania

December 2011

Pdfcasting: Baker Tilly Klitou Romanian Tax Monthly August 2011

September 8, 2011 Leave a comment

Neacşu's Letter, written in 1512, is the oldes...

The oldest document in the Romanian language - it stays the same but the tax laws change every few months!

Baker Tilly Klitou sent us their latest Romanian tax alert.

Dear Quoracy.com subscribers,

Please find enclosed Baker Tilly Klitou Tax Alert for the period of August 2011 in English and Romanian language.

The purpose of this Tax Monthly is to inform you about the latest tax legislation changes that could have a major impact on your company’s activity.

In case you need additional information or comments are necessary please do not hesitate to contact us.

If you do not wish to receive further news updates, please let us know or unsubscribe by clicking the link below, at the end of this e-mail.

Kind regards,

Nadia Oanea

Tax Manager

Bucharest Office
52, Splaiul Independentei,
Bucharest, Romania
Tel: +40-21-3156100

Fax: +40-21-3156102
E-mail: mailto:nadia.oanea

Tax Monthly_August_ 2011_EN.pdf
Tax Monthly_August_ 2011_RO.pdf

Baker Tilly Klitou – Romania Tax Monthly March 2011

April 5, 2011 Leave a comment

Major varieties (graiuri) of the Romanian lang...

Romanian dialects map. Thankfully that doesn't impact on taxation...

Baker Tilly Klitou have sent us their Romanian tax monthly, see the pdfs at the bottom of the post:

Dear Quoracy.com subscribers,

Please find enclosed Baker Tilly Klitou Tax Alert for the period of March 2011 in English and Romanian language.

The purpose of this Tax Monthly is to inform you about the latest tax legislation changes that could have a major impact on your company’s activity.

In case you deem additional information or comments are necessary please do not hesitate to contact us.

If you do not wish to receive further news updates, please let us know or unsubscribe by clicking the link below, at the end of this e-mail.

Kind regards,

George Sinca
Senior Tax Consultant
Bucharest Office
52, Splaiul Independentei,
Bucharest, Romania
Tel: +40-21-3156100
Fax: +40-21-3156102
E-mail
: mailto:marius.cojuhovschi
Web:www.bakertillyklitou.ro

Tax Monthly_March_2011_ENx.pdf
Tax Monthly_Martie_2011_ROx.pdf

Business and Tax Newsletter Hungary 3/2011

April 5, 2011 Leave a comment

Budapest old turkish bath

...fantastikos hely...

Baker Tilly Hungaria have sent out their March business and tax newsletter:

Tisztelt Hölgyem/Uram,

 

A Baker Tilly Hungária megjelentette legújabb „Business & Tax Newsletter” című kiadványát, melyet

a következő linkre kattintva tekinthet meg (a „Hírlevelek” boxban): Newsletter 3/2011

 

Hírlevelünk témái:

  • Forrásadó kötelezettséggel kapcsolatos határidők
  • A NAV ellenőrzési irányelvei
  • Kettős adóztatást elkerülő egyezmények

 

Hírlevelünk Acrobat Reader szoftverrel olvasható, mely ingyenesen letölthetõ a következõ helyről:
http://www.adobe.com/products/acrobat/readstep2.html

 

Amennyiben hírlevelünket hasznosnak találja, és szeretné, hogy mások is megkapják, vagy a jövőben

nem szertné, hogy hírlevelünket megküldjük Önnek, akkor kérjük, ezt a newsletter@bakertillyhungaria.hu

címre küldött e-mail-ben jelezze.

 

——————————————————————————————————————————————————-

 

Dear Sir / Madam,

 

Baker Tilly Hungária issued its latest „Business &Tax Newsletter” which can be accessed by clicking on the following link

(in the „Newsletter” box): Newsletter 3/2011

 

 

The main topics covered therein are:

  • Deadlines relating to withholding tax liabilities
  • Audit Guidelines of NAV (National Tax and Customs Administration)
  • Double tax treaties

 

Our newsletter can be read with Acrobat Reader which is downloadable by clicking on the following link:

http://www.adobe.com/products/acrobat/readstep2.html

 

If you found our newsletter useful and would like to include anyone else on, or would like to remove

your e-mail address from our mailing list, please notify us at newsletter@bakertillyhungaria.hu.

Üdvözlettel / Best regards,

 

Baker Tilly Hungária

independent member of Baker Tilly International

 

Address:  H-1016 Budapest, Zsolt u. 4., Hungary

phone.:    +36  1 225 34 90

fax:         +36  1 225 34 91

e-mail:     newsletter@bakertillyhungaria.hu; info@bakertillyhungaria.hu

web:        www.bakertillyhungaria.hu

It pays to avoid the BBBs (Bargain Basement Bookkeepers)

March 3, 2011 Leave a comment

Violent Storm Strikes Western Europe

Is a storm brewing over your books and records?

I am writing to relate a story based on true events which came to light last week when one gentleman came into one of our offices and spoke to me. To keep matters confidential, I won’t say the country – the same can happen in any country – or identify anything about this company the gentleman had – even the sector. It can happen to many sectors.

This gentleman had given his company bookkeeping and tax affairs to an outsourced book-keeper for his business in that particular country. He used outsourcing back home in his own country (I’m not saying where that is either) and he appreciated the benefit of being able to have his bookkeeping professionally handled by experts without needing to employ anyone, worry about holiday cover, etc etc.

Some time ago this gentleman had included our firm in his search, and we gave him a price entirely fair for a company with our niche in the market, that is, internationally trained people, with English, with proper quality assurance, supervision and back-up.  In other words,  a peer-reviewed, branded service tailored absolutely to the needs of West European businesses in the middle tier coming to start up in East Europe, and also very good for businesses not exactly in the middle tier and from places outside West Europe.

That means that the fee offered was not nearly as high as a Big Four service would cost, but certainly higher than a purely local service.

Now I’m not knocking the purely local services – many of them are very good, but for purely local clients as they don’t tend to be claiming proficiency in foreign languages or have the ability to engage cross-culturally with the client (a source of just as many miscommunications as the language barrier on its own). They are not a great fit with the international client, and often their cheaper price becomes a false economy as frustrations rise on both sides of the desk.

The problem in this case wasn’t lack of English – this gentleman’s chosen bookkeeper spoke English, apparently.

But she was in business just on her own. With no back-up employees, probably very little insurance, probably very few resources to turn to, and very few overheads hence enabling a price no quality firm could ever compete with. That was the price that tempted this gentleman to take her bid over mine.

But since then, it became apparent that this bookkeeper was not entirely what she seemed to be.

Neither this gentleman nor myself are qualified psychiatrists, and we could only speculate on what might have gone wrong, or been wrong all along with this person. The fact is, though, that mental illness happens in the human population. We’ve probably all had employees or acquaintances who have had a mental illness, and in a larger company they quickly get noticed by colleagues, and steps taken to look after them and safeguard the clients’ affairs. When they are on their own, no such controls exist.

Suffice it to say this lady no longer was answering emails or picking up the telephone when he was calling, and when he rang from another number she didn’t know, she put the phone down when she heard his voice – the person entrusted with his company’s books and records and processing a VAT reclaim for more money than she would normally earn in many years. As you can see, the situation is now much harder – and therefore more costly - for us to repair than if he had simply given us the work in the first place.

It simply doesn’t pay to use these Bargain Basement Bookkeepers. You know what you get if you pay peanuts, and if a price looks too good to be true, it probably is.

Should your Company have a pro-forma audit?

January 19, 2011 Leave a comment

Mostrador de um relógio Foto de Jose Goncalves

Tempus fugit - is it time for your proforma audit?

For businesses which have never been audited but which are growing up quickly to meet the audit thresholds in a year or two, you may wish to consider having your first audit done while it is still voluntary to do so, and the results, if less positive than expected, can at least be kept private.

Once your business has exceeded the audit thresholds (very typically in Europe this means for a private company about 50 employees, 5 million Euros turnover and 2.5 million Euros of gross assets, and it means 2 out of those three conditions – we just stated actually the Polish ones verbatim, (with the proviso that they also state a set PLN amount to avoid subjectivity for businesses that are on the cusp), but most countries are not far off that – even the Czech Republic which really needs much smaller thresholds)

Clearly this doesn’t apply at all to public limited companies, ie. the “S.A.”, “a.s.”, UK plc or German AG style companies which must be audited regardless of size – in some jurisdictions even if they are dormant – but for private limited liability companies most jurisdictions have size criteria like the ones just given – for Slovakia about 60% of the sizes given, so please note that this is divergent from the Czech ones, which are far too high for that country and result in proportionally fewer audits, which is a bad thing for corporate governance in that country.

While you are under the limits audit is voluntary. And you can have an unofficial audit whereby the audit comes and does for you all the normal work he would do if officially appointed, but it is only pro-forma. “Pro-forma” is Latin for something like the idea of “as if” so the auditor will work and report as if they had been properly appointed, but it is really a dry run for you. You do not appoint them as statutory auditors in the minuted general meeting, you do not have to file the report as the audit was voluntary, and you get all the benefit of the audit without the risk, and on top of all of that, I can get you these pro-forma audits for only 75% of the cost of a statutory audit, because the Firms we associate with want to promote good voluntary governance practice in the economy.

If you wait for your first audit until it is an obligatory one because you’ve outgrown the size criteria – and as we come out of the recession that will happen to some of you next year hopefully sooner than you dare hope for now – then if the auditor finds something wrong then the report of the auditor could be “modified” – I’ll do a separate article on what sorts of “modifications” exist and what they mean in accountancy speak, but it’s not good if you get one.

It will not help if you need a loan, and it will probably trigger a lot of interest on the part of the tax inspector. But you’ll have to publish it anyway, if there isn’t time to do the remedial work a good auditor should outline to you in time for your statutory deadline.

Now auditors get cajoled, encouraged in a friendly way or even outright threatened by desparate managers and owners to overlook things or change to an opinion that doesn’t match the facts, and there is nothing that can be done in those circumstances. Auditors are not generally anywhere near as afraid of their client as they are of their regulator, but more than that we are educated throughout our professional lives to be independent in our outlook, and so the only way to get out of some modified opinions is to do the remedial work the auditor recommends or make the adjustments that they recommend.

There’s no point in changing to another auditor you think will be more pliable – they must write to the old auditor and ask if there are any reasons why they cannot act. The best thing to do, if you are not sure how well your company will stand up to an audit is to have your first one a year or so before you need to. Then if the audit shows up a lot to be desired, you have a whole year to put it right and nobody will ever know because auditors are bound by confidentiality – it isn’t us who even publish our reports, it’s the responsibility of the client. The report is given to its addressee, which is always the shareholder, and some other corporate governance boards if they are in existence.

So it’s well worth thinking about, especially if your business has been growing fast and maybe has outgrown its systems.

Let us know if we can help.

If you haven’t appointed an auditor yet in Poland and you needed to by law, here’s what can happen…

January 5, 2011 Leave a comment

Rzeczpospolita (newspaper)

A leading business daily in Polish

An excerpt on appointment of auditors from one of the leading Polish newspapers Rzeczpospolita.

There are a few articles here on one large page, one of them dealing with what an audit report is and what it’s supposed to contain. This is anodyne and will be what you would expect from your own country, if it is in line with IFAC standards.

Another article talks about what the audit thresholds are. I’m going to write a separate article on audit thresholds comparing different countries in our region, but Poland has the fairly sensible levels of any SA, and for an Sp. z o.o. it’s 2/3 of the following: 1) Turnover 5 million Euros in the preceding year, 2) gross assets of 2.5 million Euros in the preceding year and 3) 50 employees on average in the year. The article offers a PLN interpretation of these levels for this calendar year end. I do not really want to reproduce that as not every company has calendar year and it is also not hard to work it out whether your Company in Poland has mandatory audit or not, and if you’re not sure, ask me and I’ll tell you for free.

The most interesting article in this audit related supplement, though, is probably the one which states that in line with article 64 paragraph 1 part 4 of the Act on Accounting,  if the management needs to appoint an auditor it should be in time so that he/she can observe any material inventory counts.

So what that means in practice is that you’re probably OK if you have no stock or fixed assets. If on the other hand you do have these and they were due for a count, the auditor is risking big trouble if they come in and give an opinion on the figures not having attended the count. If this is of interest in your case, please look up the much larger on that subject below.

In the worst case there will be Companies who did their stock-counts without the observance of an auditor and they later discover they need to appoint one. Three alternative things can then happen. The first is that you chance on an ethical but unhelpful auditor, who refuses to take on an audit if the stocktake is already done. If you only meet such auditors, then you won’t be able to get the audit done and you’ll be in breach of the Act if you were over the size criterion or are a joint-stock company.

The second option is where the auditor says I can do this, but later pulls a qualification on you because of not having been able to attend the counts. You then have to file an audit report which isn’t 100% clean, and then live with the fact that you may not be able to declare a dividend and that the tax office will come breathing down you necks wondering what is going in. I don’t think it’s ethical for an auditor to lead the client into taking them by not being clear that they intend from the moment they are hired to give a modified audit report, but some people seriously justify it to themselves that it’s the client’s fault for not coming early enough.

Then there is the option where the auditor is both helpful and ethical, in that they take part in other procedures designed to make good the absence of an actual attendance at the time of the stocktake. Some auditors can use their business understanding and imagination to gain the assurance they need professionally without needing to do the whole stocktake over again. You may need to shop around to find these ones. I can certainly help you find people who approach their work in that more constructive period though.

In the very worst case, you may need to do the stock take again, but beware, you cannot do that officially after one month from year end anyway, and it involves extra work on the reconciliation afterwards, which will be on the shoulders of your chief accountant.

If you’re late appointing, don’t delay it any more – that’s the moral of the story!

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 677 other followers

%d bloggers like this: